This PhD project proposes an interdisciplinary study of reactive nitrogen (RN), a family of chemical compounds whose uses, representations, and effects intersect scientific, industrial, environmental, health, and political fields. Positioned at the interface between biochemistry and the sociology of science, this work focuses on a central yet still little-discussed object in the social sciences: reactive nitrogen, and more specifically nitric oxide (NO), named molecule of the year by the journal Science in 1992. The discovery of the physiological role of NO led to the Nobel Prize in Medicine in 1998 and to the emergence of a new field of research supported by significant public and private funding, marked by the creation of new scientific societies, conferences and journals, and by the publication of more than 200,000 scientific articles in 30 years. At the crossroads of biomedical promises and scientific controversies, NO crystallizes a tension between, on the one hand, very strong therapeutic hopes and, on the other, major health consequences that are still poorly understood.

The project is structured around two main axes: Axis 1 – Promises and limits of scientific innovation. This axis aims to analyze the research trajectories surrounding NO since the 1990s: what promises were made, in what contexts, and why were some of them not fulfilled? The study will address both scientific and epistemological obstacles as well as institutional or political dimensions (disciplinary fragmentation, funding, research coordination, etc.). Axis 2 – Circulations, appropriations, and narratives. This axis follows NO and reactive nitrogen across different social arenas – laboratories, industry, regulation, politics, civil society – to understand how this biochemical entity is mobilized, defined, valorized, contested. Particular attention will be paid to the contradictory representations that coexist (beneficial molecule / toxic molecule), to problematic or incomplete uses, and to the effects of these circulations on public policy and social uses.

The approach adopted is multidisciplinary and will combine: i) an understanding of the biochemical nature of the object; ii) tools from the sociology of science, the history of technology, and studies of scientific controversies. The data to be collected will be: i) bibliometric data: use of databases such as OPENALEX / WOS; ii) documentary corpus: in-depth analysis of scientific archives, key publications, patents and institutional reports related to NO and RN, and media coverage of NO since the 1980s; iii) semi-structured interviews: a series of interviews will be conducted with various actors who have contributed to the study and use of NO, including: researchers who have worked on biomedical or ecological applications of NO; scientists who are members of the NO Society, a scholarly community dedicated to advancing knowledge on the NO molecule; industrial stakeholders involved in the technological valorization of reactive nitrogen compounds; policy makers and experts who have overseen regulation or public policies concerning NO and RN.

The expected results and contributions are as follows: From a scientific perspective, this research aims to establish the current state of social and scientific representations of reactive nitrogen / NO, to identify points of friction between academic spheres and public, commercial and political arenas, and to propose an analysis of the mechanisms of promise, valorization and misuse of knowledge. The thesis aims to enrich debates on the conditions of circulation of innovations and on the modalities of knowledge production in the life sciences. From a social and political perspective, it will contribute to a better understanding of the health and ecological issues linked to RN, and will formulate recommendations for decision-makers to better articulate expertise, responsibility and public policy.

From the perspective of supervision and research environment of the thesis... this project will be co-supervised by Jérôme Santolini (biochemist, Senior Researcher at CEA – Laboratory for Oxidative Stress and Detoxification), Michel Dubois (sociologist, Senior Researcher at CNRS) and Catherine Guaspare (sociologist, Research Engineer at CNRS). It will be conducted within two research units: CEA – DRF/Joliot: expertise in NO, reactive nitrogen and systemic redox approaches; GEMASS – CNRS-Sorbonne University: sociology of science and technology.

The doctoral student will benefit from a stimulating research environment, combining scientific investigation and critical reflexivity, with a strong interdisciplinary orientation and closely connected to public health and science communication issues